Education, Protection and a Pathway out of Child Labor
Education is a fundamental right and one of the most important foundations for reducing poverty, inequality and exploitation. Yet millions of children in Pakistan remain outside the formal education system, while many others face circumstances that make regular school attendance difficult or impossible.
For children affected by child labor, simply opening a school is often not enough. Some have never enrolled in school. Others have dropped out after several years. Some are over-age for their grade, while others live in communities where schools are distant, overcrowded or difficult to access. Children working in agriculture, domestic work, informal employment and brick-kiln communities may face particularly complex barriers.
For these children, Alternative Learning Pathways (ALP), Non-Formal Education (NFE), accelerated learning and flexible community-based education can provide a practical route back to learning.
An evening or flexible learning center may be appropriate in some circumstances, but it should not be viewed as a way of making child labor compatible with education. The purpose must be to protect children, restore their right to education, reduce harmful child labor, and create a pathway toward formal or recognized education and a safer future.
The Scale of the Challenge in Pakistan

Pakistan faces a significant education-access challenge.
UNICEF Pakistan currently estimates that 25.1 million children aged 5–16 are out of school, representing approximately 35 percent of the population in that age group. UNICEF describes Pakistan as having the world’s second-highest number of out-of-school children. Punjab alone accounts for an estimated 9.7 million out-of-school children aged 5–16. (UNICEF)
At the same time, Pakistan now has a much stronger evidence base on child labor.
UNICEF’s national synthesis of child labor surveys across Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Baluchistan and Islamabad Capital Territory draws together evidence from nearly 200,000 households and more than 500,000 children. The synthesis estimates approximately 8.6 million children aged 5–17 engaged in child labor and approximately 6.6 million in hazardous work. (UNICEF)
These figures should be understood carefully. The national synthesis combines provincial and territory surveys conducted as part of a coordinated evidence-building effort; it is not equivalent to a single-day national census.
Nevertheless, the evidence demonstrates the scale of the challenge and the close relationship between child labor, education, health, protection and future opportunities.
What Is Child Labor?

Child labor should not be confused with every form of activity or responsibility undertaken by a child.
The term generally refers to work that is harmful to children, interferes with their education or development, or falls within prohibited forms of employment according to applicable national law and international standards.
Child labor can include situations where children:
- Work for excessive hours
- Miss or abandon school because of work
- Perform hazardous tasks
- Work in dangerous environments
- Are exposed to exploitation or abuse
- Perform forced or bonded labor
- Undertake work that negatively affects their health, safety or development
The problem is therefore not simply whether a child is working.
The critical questions are:
What kind of work is the child doing? How many hours are involved? Is the child attending school? Is the work hazardous? Is the child being exploited? And what circumstances are pushing the child into work?
This distinction is essential when designing responsible education and child-protection programmes.
Why Child Labor and Education Are Connected
Child labor and school exclusion can reinforce one another.
A child may leave school because a family needs additional income. Once the child leaves school, returning becomes increasingly difficult. The child may fall behind academically, become over-age for the grade, lose confidence, and eventually remain outside education.
This can create a cycle:
Poverty → School exclusion → Child labor → Learning loss → Limited skills → Limited future opportunities → Continued poverty
Breaking this cycle requires more than a classroom.
It requires a combination of:
- Quality education
- Child protection
- Family engagement
- Social protection
- Livelihood support
- Legal enforcement
- Health services
- Community awareness
- Safe transition pathways
UNICEF Pakistan’s education programme specifically emphasizes alternative learning pathways, school-community linkages, and measures to improve enrollment, reduce dropout, and support completion and transition. (UNICEF)
Alternative Learning Pathways: A Practical Response
Alternative Learning Pathways (ALP) are flexible education approaches intended to reach children and young people who are not successfully served by conventional schooling.
Depending on the context, an ALP programme can include:
- Non-formal basic education
- Accelerated learning
- Community learning centers
- Catch-up classes
- Flexible learning schedules
- Foundational literacy and numeracy
- Second-chance education
- Community-based education
- Transition programmes
- Skills development for appropriate age groups
UNICEF Pakistan identifies the expansion of equitable and quality alternative learning pathways as part of its education response to the country’s out-of-school children challenge. (UNICEF)
This is important because children outside school are not a single group. A five-year-old who has never enrolled requires a different response from a 15-year-old who has spent several years working and has missed most of primary education.
Where Evening Learning Can Play a Role
The term “evening school” is commonly used to describe education provided outside conventional school hours.
In some communities, flexible timing may help reach children who face barriers to daytime education.
However, an evening programme should not be designed on the assumption that:
“Children will work during the day and study at night.”
That approach risks normalizing child labor.
Instead, a responsible flexible-learning programme should work toward reducing children’s involvement in harmful labor and moving them into safe and sustainable education.
A better framework is:
Identification → Protection → Assessment → Flexible Learning → Accelerated Learning → Transition → Follow-up
Evening classes can therefore be one component of a broader education recovery and transition strategy.
Non-Formal Education in Pakistan: Evidence from the Brick-Kiln Sector
Pakistan has previous experience using non-formal education to reach children in vulnerable communities.
The International Labor Organization has documented programmes involving brick-kiln communities in Punjab.
In 2015, the ILO reported an initiative with the Government of Punjab to enroll children of brick-kiln workers into the education system. The initiative included free education, school bags, and books for enrolled children. (International Labor Organization)
The ILO also documented an earlier pilot intervention in Nankana Sahib that included:
- Non-formal education centers
- Assistance with birth certificates
- National identity documentation
- Social-security registration
- Health screening
- Connections to government social-protection programmes
The experience demonstrates that education interventions can become more effective when connected with other services that address the barriers families face. (International Labor Organization)
Brick Kilns, Child Labor and Bonded Labor
Brick-kiln communities require particular attention because child labor can exist alongside poverty, debt, informal employment, and bonded-labor risks.
The ILO’s 2022 study of Pakistan’s brick-kiln supply chain examined fundamental principles and rights at work, with a particular focus on child labor and bonded labor.
The study identified implementation challenges including limited labor-inspection outreach, insufficient inspection capacity, and resource constraints affecting enforcement. (International Labor Organization)
This means that an education project in a brick-kiln community should not operate as an isolated classroom project.
A stronger response can combine:
Education + Child Protection + Legal Awareness + Documentation + Health + Social Protection + Family Livelihood Support
Such an integrated approach recognizes the circumstances surrounding the child rather than treating school attendance as the only problem.
Pakistan’s Legal Framework
Child labor is also a legal and public-policy issue.
Pakistan has federal and provincial legislation concerning child employment, hazardous work, and bonded labor.
The ILO Child Labor Observatory identifies several relevant laws, including the Employment of Children Act, 1991, the Punjab Restriction on Employment of Children Act, 2016, the Punjab Prohibition of Child Labor at Brick Kilns Act, 2016, Sindh legislation, and Baluchistan legislation. The ILO also notes that legal coverage and implementation remain uneven across jurisdictions. (International Labor Organization)
The Punjab Prohibition of Child Labor at Brick Kilns Act, 2016 specifically provides for prohibition of child labor and regulation of labor at brick kilns, including provisions concerning employment, advances, inspectors, enforcement and penalties. (Natlex)
For NGOs, this has an important implication:
Education programmes should support children’s rights and access to education while complementing, not replacing the responsibility of government authorities to enforce labor and child-protection laws.
The Importance of Family Economic Support
Child labor is frequently connected to household economic pressure.
If a family depends on a child’s earnings or labor, simply telling the family to remove the child from work may not be sufficient.
A responsible intervention should examine the household situation and, where possible, connect families with appropriate support.
Potential components include:
- Social protection referrals
- Food assistance
- Adult livelihood support
- Skills development
- Microenterprise support
- Employment referrals
- Health assistance
- Legal assistance
- Debt and bonded-labor support
The ILO has specifically incorporated social protection, functional literacy, and rights education into programmes addressing vulnerable brick-kiln communities. (International Labor Organization)
This reflects a central development principle:
Children should not carry the burden of solving household poverty through harmful labor.
The Role of Parents and Communities
Sustainable education programmes require community participation.
Parents and caregivers should be engaged through:
Education awareness
Families can learn about the importance of education, school attendance, and children’s rights.
Child protection awareness
Parents can be informed about exploitation, abuse, hazardous work, and available reporting mechanisms.
Community identification
Community members can help identify children who are outside school or at risk of dropping out.
Follow-up
Community-based workers can monitor whether children remain engaged in education.
Referral
Families can be connected to government and humanitarian services where appropriate.
Education programmes become stronger when communities see them as a shared responsibility rather than an external project.
Girls and Other Vulnerable Children
Not all children experience exclusion from education in the same way.
Girls may face additional barriers related to household responsibilities, safety, sanitation, social expectations, and limited mobility.
Children with disabilities may face physical, communication, or institutional barriers.
Children affected by displacement, poverty, or social exclusion may require additional support.
Therefore, flexible education programmes should consider:
- Gender-responsive learning spaces
- Safe sanitation facilities
- Menstrual health and hygiene
- Disability inclusion
- Safe transportation where required
- Appropriate learning materials
- Child safeguarding
- Confidential complaints mechanisms
- Referral services
Flexibility should never mean lower standards.
Children participating in non-formal education deserve safe environments, qualified teaching, and meaningful learning outcomes.
Child Safeguarding Must Be Central
Any organization working with children has a responsibility to establish strong safeguarding systems.
A professional programme should include:
Safeguarding policy
Clear procedures for preventing and responding to abuse, exploitation and neglect.
Staff and volunteer standards
Teachers, volunteers and field staff should understand appropriate behavior and professional boundaries.
Recruitment procedures
Organizations should use appropriate screening, references and safeguarding checks.
Reporting mechanism
Children and families should have accessible ways to raise concerns.
Referral system
Serious protection cases should be referred to appropriate professional services and authorities.
Data protection
Personal information about children should be collected and stored responsibly.
Safe learning spaces
Learning centers should be physically and socially safe for children.
Safeguarding should not be treated as a separate document. It should be integrated into programme design, recruitment, teaching, monitoring and reporting.
What Should a Flexible Learning Programme Teach?
The curriculum should be based on the child’s age, previous education, and assessed learning level.
Foundational Literacy
Children should develop:
- Reading
- Writing
- Vocabulary
- Comprehension
- Communication
Numeracy
Learning can include:
- Numbers
- Addition and subtraction
- Multiplication and division
- Measurement
- Practical mathematics
Life Skills
Age-appropriate life skills can include:
- Communication
- Problem solving
- Decision-making
- Personal safety
- Teamwork
- Confidence building
Health and Hygiene
Programmes can incorporate:
- Handwashing
- Clean water
- Personal hygiene
- Nutrition
- Menstrual health education
- Disease prevention
Child Rights and Protection
Children can learn:
- Their right to education
- How to recognize unsafe situations
- How to seek help
- How to report abuse
- Respect and equality
Assessment Before Enrollment
One of the most important elements of a professional programme is learning assessment.
Age alone should not determine placement.
A 13-year-old child who has never attended school may have very different learning needs from a 13-year-old who completed Grade 5 before dropping out.
A basic assessment can measure:
- Reading
- Writing
- Comprehension
- Numeracy
- Previous schooling
- Language needs
- Learning difficulties
The results can then inform an individual learning plan.
From Non-Formal Education to Formal Education
Non-formal education should ideally function as a bridge.
A potential pathway is:
Out-of-school child
↓
Protection and needs assessment.
↓
Foundational / non-formal learning
↓
Accelerated learning
↓
Formal or recognized education
↓
Secondary education/skills development
↓
Further education or age-appropriate decent work
This transition is particularly important for older children.
A programme should therefore define from the beginning where children are expected to go after completing the intervention.
Learning Outcomes Matter More Than Attendance
Counting the number of children enrolled is not enough.
A professional education programme should measure whether children are actually learning.
Important indicators can include:
| Area | Example Measurement |
| Enrollment | Number of children enrolled |
| Attendance | Regular attendance rate |
| Literacy | Improvement in reading and writing |
| Numeracy | Improvement in mathematics |
| Retention | Children remaining in education. |
| Transition | Children moving to formal/recognized education. |
| Protection | Safeguarding cases identified and referred |
| Gender | Girls’ enrollment and retention |
| Family engagement | Parent participation |
| Child labor | Change in harmful labor involvement |
| Completion | Children completing the learning cycle |
Baseline and endline assessments can provide evidence of change.
A Practical Model for NGOs
An NGO developing a flexible education programme can consider the following eight-stage model.
1. Community Mapping
Identify:
- Out-of-school children
- Child labor patterns
- Existing schools
- Learning centers
- Transport barriers
- Health and protection services
- Household vulnerabilities
2. Child Identification
Identify children who are:
- Out of school
- At risk of dropping out
- Working in hazardous conditions
- Living in vulnerable households
3. Protection Assessment
Assess immediate risks and establish referral mechanisms.
4. Learning Assessment
Measure each child’s existing educational level.
5. Flexible Education
Provide an appropriate learning pathway.
6. Family Support
Connect families with relevant social protection, livelihood, health, and legal services.
7. Transition
Move children toward formal or recognized education wherever possible.
8. Follow-Up
Continue monitoring after transition to reduce dropout and ensure continued protection.
International Development Perspective
The challenge of child labor cannot be addressed by one institution.
Government departments, schools, civil society organizations, international agencies, communities, families, employers, and donors each have different responsibilities.
UNICEF
UNICEF Pakistan supports government efforts to expand equitable education, including alternative learning pathways and stronger school-community linkages. (UNICEF)
ILO
The ILO focuses on child labor, decent work, labor rights, forced labor, and strengthening systems to address child and bonded labor. Its Pakistan work has included specific initiatives involving brick-kiln communities and non-formal education. (International Labor Organization)
Government
Government institutions remain central to legislation, education systems, labor inspection, enforcement, teacher recruitment, public financing, and child protection.
Civil Society
NGOs can help identify underserved children, provide community-based services, strengthen referrals, and support government systems.
Donors
Donors can support evidence-based programmes that combine education with protection, family resilience, and measurable outcomes.
Sustainable Development Goals
Flexible education and child-labor prevention contribute to several Sustainable Development Goals.
SDG 4 — Quality Education
Promote inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning opportunities.
SDG 8 — Decent Work
Target 8.7 calls for action to eradicate forced labor and end the worst forms of child labor.
SDG 1 — No Poverty
Reducing poverty is central to addressing the economic pressures associated with child labor.
SDG 5 — Gender Equality
Girls require equal opportunities to access and complete education.
SDG 10 — Reduced Inequalities
Education can help address exclusion among disadvantaged and marginalized children.
What Success Should Look Like
The success of a programme should not simply be measured by the number of classrooms opened or books distributed.
Success should mean that:
- More children are learning.
- Children are safer.
- Children are less exposed to harmful labor.
- Families understand the value of education.
- Children who dropped out have a realistic pathway back to education.
- Girls and marginalized children can participate safely.
- Learning outcomes improve.
- Children transition to sustainable education opportunities.
- Government and community systems are strengthened.
The ultimate measure is not how many children entered a classroom, but whether children gained a safer and more meaningful pathway to education and opportunity.
A Message for Communities
A child working today is still a child with potential.
A child who has dropped out of school should not be considered a lost generation.
With appropriate educational support, family engagement, protection, and opportunity, children can rebuild their learning journey.
The solution is not simply to create another classroom.
The solution is to build a pathway.
A pathway from exclusion to education.
A pathway from exploitation to protection.
A pathway from poverty to opportunity.
And, ultimately, a pathway toward a future in which children can learn, grow, and contribute through safe and dignified opportunities.
Conclusion
Pakistan’s child labor and out-of-school-child challenges are deeply interconnected with poverty, education access, family vulnerability, social protection, and enforcement of child-protection and labor laws.
Current evidence from UNICEF demonstrates the scale of both education exclusion and child labor, while ILO experience in Pakistan demonstrates that non-formal education can be an important component of responses for vulnerable communities, including brick-kiln families. (UNICEF)
Flexible and non-formal education should therefore be understood not as a replacement for quality formal education, and not as a justification for children remaining in labor, but as a bridge for children who have been excluded from conventional education.
For organizations working with vulnerable communities, the strongest model is one that combines:
Education + Child Protection + Family Support + Social Protection + Community Engagement + Legal Awareness + Transition + Monitoring
When these elements work together, education can become more than an intervention.
It can become a pathway to protection, dignity, and opportunity.

